John Dwyer, Vermont, 1756

John Dwyer and Jacob Blount sure on their own to expend 50 lbs so you can “our Sovering Lord King George next their Heirs and you will Successors” towards the 31 Get 1756, into the a wedding bond. The duty mentioned, “The fresh requirements of the duty that whereas a marriage is supposed ranging from John Dwyer and you will Jemina Much time both of it county of Tyrrell aforesaid, Virgin woman, Now if you have zero lawfull result in in order to hinder this new said wedding, then over duty to be void...” nine

Joshua Farrell, Pennsylvania, 1785

During the 1785, Thomas Harrison, Currier, and you may Joshua Farrell, Mariner, of the City of Philadelphia, joined towards a bond considering the upcoming wedding away from Joshua Farrell and you can Mary Anne McCartney. 10 Even though this list is officially with the the termination of the fresh Cutting edge Combat, it's still a so good exemplory instance of the fresh colonial time bonds.

“The state of the obligation is such, if there will perhaps not hereafter appear any legal assist otherwise impediment, by the reasoning of every Pre-bargain, Consanguinity, Affinity, or other just Trigger anyway, but that above-mentioned Joshua Farrell and you will Mary Anne McCartney, could possibly get legally Wed; and this there is not any Fit oriented before any legal, to have otherwise towards any such Pre-contract; and have when your said People, each of these, was of your full Age of 21 years old Decades, and are also perhaps not in University fees out-of their unique Mothers, or feel the complete Consent regarding their Moms and dads or Guardians correspondingly towards the said Wedding; incase they, otherwise either of those, are not indented Servants, and you may carry out and you will should rescue harmless and maintain indemnified the above-mentioned John Dickinson Esquire...and you may will at the same time save yourself innocuous and keep indemnified the new Clergyman, Minister, otherwise Person that shall get in on the said Activities inside Wedding, to possess, or by the Cause out of his very performing; upcoming it Duty to be Emptiness and of not one Effect, usually to face entirely Push and you may Advantage.”

During my browse, I have seen several relationships securities to have my forefathers and you may lookup subjects. One to, for example, 's the wedding out of my personal husband's fourth-great-grandparents, Lewis Tharp and you will Joanna Western.

Lewis Tharp and you will Joanna West were hitched for the Fauquier State, Virginia inside the 1805. The sole listing one remains of the matrimony 's the bond, which has the agree regarding Joanna's father. Due to the fact she was not yet , twenty-that, their own dad, John West, provided their authored consent. The fresh new bondsman is William West, who was simply more than likely new sis of Joanna Western. eleven

George Tharp and you will Polly Noland, Virginia, 1801

Yet another thread I came buralara göz atın across when comparing south west loved ones are the wedding thread of George Tharp and you may Polly Noland. The connection try old 12 January 1801 when you look at the Fauquier Condition. John West are new bondsman. 12

I determined there had been a couple connectivity ranging from George Tharp and his awesome bondsman, John Western. Earliest, John Western try the newest uncle off Polly Noland. Polly's mom, “Gemime Noland,” given their permission to have Polly so you're able to wed George Tharp, because she was not yet age 21. Jemima (Arnold) Noland is actually the newest sibling away from Bathsehba Arnold, who was new partner off John West. Jemima are widowed once Polly are married, which is most likely as to why uncle John Western try asked to get new bondsman.

The next connection ranging from John West and you can George Tharp is that John Western reduced taxation to possess George Tharp inside 1799 and you can 1800. 13 This could mean that George Tharp is utilized by John West, maybe as an enthusiastic apprentice otherwise servant. Men exactly who working someone else was basically always accountable for paying the fees of them servants otherwise apprentices. 14